To ensure that our students are well prepared for success in their future careers, the department follows a formal procedure in the development of our curriculum, assessment of its effectiveness, and improvement informed by assessments and other feedback mechanisms. The BS degree in Chemical Engineering is accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET. This commission reviews all aspects of our undergraduate program every six years, and provides a valuable element of external oversight. All told, by continually assessing and improving our program, and being formally accredited, we enhance the effectiveness and career opportunities of our graduates.
Our bachelor's degree in Chemical Engineering is accredited by the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, “a not-for-profit, non-governmental accrediting agency for programs in applied science, computing, engineering and engineering technology…recognized as an accreditor by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. ABET accreditation provides assurance that a college or university program meets the quality standards of the profession for which that program prepares graduates.”
Our Accreditation process is structured around two sets of goals reflecting skill sets you should have when you graduate (Student Outcomes, or SO’s for short), and more advanced skill sets you should have a few years after graduation (Program Educational Outcomes, or PEO’s for short).
We are re-accredited every six years based on a review by ABET that evaluates a number of factors, including:
We stay at the leading edge, self-correct and get better by embracing the six-year ABET accreditation cycle as the premier vehicle to continually improve our program.
The goal of the courses you take is to empower you with a skill set that will serve you well in professional practice. You will have certain skills when you graduate, and these skills will develop as you gain experience.
Student Outcomes (SO’s) are specific statements of the knowledge and abilities you are expected to have by the time of graduation.
By the completion of their undergraduate studies, students are expected to demonstrate:
(a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering,
(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,
(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints,
(d) an ability to function on multi-disciplinary teams,
(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,
(f) an understand of professional and ethical responsibility,
(g) an ability to communicate effectively.
(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context,
(i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning,
(j) a knowledge of contemporary issues,
(k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
Program Education Objectives (PEO’s) are broad statements that describe the abilities and accomplishments that you are expected to have within a few years of obtaining the BS degree from our program.
Within a few years of obtaining a bachelor's degree in chemical engineering from the University at Buffalo, the recent graduate
Student Outcomes may be regarded as concrete goals of our undergraduate program in support of the Program Education Objectives. In other words, by meeting the goals embodied in the Student Outcomes, and subsequently engaging in engineering practice or advanced (graduate) study for several years, the plan is for you achieve the Program Education Objectives. Look the two lists above to see the capabilities you can expect to have as a CBE graduate, and as a practicing engineer or advanced degree candidate. “Expect to have” means you can realistically anticipate having these skills after successfully completing the BS degree and starting your career. We continually strive to have our students achieve these goals.
The groups served by our undergraduate program are our Constituencies are groups served by our undergraduate program. They include alumni (i.e., the future you), employers of our graduates, and graduate and professional schools where our students pursue further study.
We learn how we are doing using Assessment, which is the process by which we evaluate how well our students are achieving the SO’s. Faculty determine the level at which our students achieve the goals embodied in each SO by grading large samples of student work with reference to Performance Indicators (PI’s), which are statements of various aspects of the SO that collectively define what it means to achieve it. The grading of each PI is carried out using a formal Rubric — a set of formal written statements that objectively define various levels of achievement or effectiveness. Assessment is carried out in courses throughout the curriculum, so that student performance is assessed from sophomore through senior years.
The courses that are best suited for Assessment varies among SO’s. For example, lab courses (CE 327, CE 328, CE 427, CE 428) are clearly the courses that should be used to assess SO (b) (an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data), and design courses (CE 404, CE 408) are clearly the courses that should be used to assess SO (c) (an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability). Both lab and design courses can be used to assess SO (d) (an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams), and SO (g) (an ability to communicate effectively), because students work in teams, and write reports and give presentations, in both of these types of courses.
We get better by Continuous Improvement, which is the process by which we regularly analyze Assessment results, and decide upon steps to take to help our students better achieve the SO’s (such as changes to content or delivery in individual courses, or to the composition or order of courses in the curriculum). This process does not occur in a vacuum. Rather, we actively engage our constituencies in tuning our PEO’s, implementing improvements, and other areas. Continuous Improvement also involves other channels of feedback, such as senior exit surveys, Lunch with the Chair events, data from course evaluations, and incorporation of suggestions from industrial participants in courses. Aside from our curriculum per se, the ABET accreditation every six years reviews our Continuous Improvement process.